1. "The Parts of a Late 19th Century
Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Sep-19th-02 at 9:19 PM
This is a link for a '19th & Early 20th
Century Ladies' Dress Glossary'. http://www.marquise.de/en/1800/glossar.shtml
.
This entire site is just really beautiful & informative.
It is all about fashion & it even includes patterns.
In the glossary they also include dress names, nothing
called a wrapper, they have a 'House Dress' and the more
formal 'Toilette de Reception'. I think that's really the
wrapper.
2. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by Edisto on Sep-19th-02 at 10:40 PM
In response to Message #1.
Some of these terms are used a little differently
from the way I've seen them used before. They also seem
to be drawn from European (especially French) custom.
In the Borden case, I recall several references to Lizzie's
having worn a "basque," a term that isn't seen here.
3. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Sep-19th-02 at 10:47 PM
In response to Message #2.
I think I prefer Toilette de Reception to
wrapper, that
site is indeed VERY European, and just so danged pretty!
4. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Sep-19th-02 at 10:53 PM
In response to Message #2.
On the starting page they have the links for
91 sites in
'The Costume Ring'.
5. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by Kashesan on Sep-28th-02 at 11:54 AM
In response to Message #2.
What's a 'basque'?(and would I look good in
one?)
6. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Sep-28th-02 at 12:15 PM
In response to Message #5.
A basque is a tight fitting blouse, it is
tight thru the
waist. I personally look better in an overblouse, I've always
had a little round belly.
7. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by Susan on Oct-2nd-02 at 1:04 AM
In response to Message #6.
Oh, I bet you would look just fine in a basque!
8. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Oct-2nd-02 at 10:32 AM
In response to Message #7.
I've seen basque-type blouses in catalogs,
they were doing
alot of those lace-up peasant styles. They look so beautiful,
and will actually fit without a corset. I also remember seeing
skirts with a little bustle at Victoria's Secret. Alas, I
came
pre-equipped with a bustle.
9. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by Susan on Oct-2nd-02 at 11:37 AM
In response to Message #8.
Love that Victoria's Secret! Wonder
bras for all us less endowed girls, woo hoo!
10. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Oct-2nd-02 at 7:17 PM
In response to Message #9.
Have you considered sewing 'tiny rows of silk
ruffles'
in the lining of your basques? (I always get out my tattered
copy of Gone with the Wind after it starts getting cool.)
11. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by Susan on Oct-2nd-02 at 10:15 PM
In response to Message #10.
No, I haven't, but, it reminds me of the ruffled
drawers I had to wear as a little girl under my dresses.
And then parents wonder why you want to lift your dress and
show them to the world?
12. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Oct-2nd-02 at 10:24 PM
In response to Message #11.
Oooh! Toddlers Gone Wild!
13. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by Susan on Oct-3rd-02 at 2:55 AM
In response to Message #12.
You know it! I guess its all those ruffles?
They just drive a girl mad after awhile, go ask Lizzie!
14. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Oct-3rd-02 at 2:50 PM
In response to Message #13.
Don't you think all those layers would have
made you
cranky after awhile? People today like to look back &
wish
that clothes still looked like that but I'm sure at the time
it was a pain. And with no air conditioning. Not so long
ago pantyhose was a new modern invention that saved women
from having to put up with garters & stockings.
I still love reading the Little House books & finally
in one
of them Laura mentions her corset, after reading about all
the work
she had to do (hard work) to realize that for several years
it had been done in a corset, it was a bit of a shock.
15. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by Susan on Oct-3rd-02 at 8:31 PM
In response to Message #14.
I know! I also remember there is a part
of the book where she helps Pa with hay mowing and is allowed
to take off her "stays" though goodness knows what
will come of her figure without 'em.
16. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Oct-3rd-02 at 10:51 PM
In response to Message #15.
It is hard to believe that girls were not
allowed
to not wear their corsets, that is just so strange to me.
With so many women having to do almost as much physical
labor as men it reminds me of that saying about Ginger
Rogers doing everything Fred Astaire did except backwards
&
in high heels.
17. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by Susan on Oct-4th-02 at 2:56 AM
In response to Message #16.
Exactly! An old co-worker and my massage
therapist told me about his grandmother who wore a corset
until the day she died, she was an avid tennis player and
would do just fine with it on! Problem was, she had
worn it for so long that when she took it off, she had back
problems, the muscles were shot from not using them to support
her back with and such!
18. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Oct-7th-02 at 12:06 AM
In response to Message #17.
I hate to admit it, but I've worn high heels
so much I cant
go barefoot or wear anything without a small heel. I even
need
to have a bit of a heel on my house shoes. That does not seem
modern at all.
19. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by Susan on Oct-7th-02 at 12:31 AM
In response to Message #18.
Yes, I know your pain with heels, I too have
suffered for fashion. But, they do make your calves
look great and your legs all long. Its funny, I was
just at a friend's birthday barbecue and every woman
there was wearing those chunky, clunky platform wedgie shoes,
myself included, and we somehow got on the subject of running.
If we had to, we all agreed that we would fall or twist an
ankle or something. But, then we all looked down and
admired each others shoes, how sick is that?
20. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Oct-7th-02 at 12:39 AM
In response to Message #19.
Isn't it strange to be talking about those
poor Victorian
women and their corsets & we aren't any better!
I can run in heels, you mean you cant? I'm always doing yard
work in heels, I'm guessing that I could play tennis in them,
but not in a corset, that is just sad.
21. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by Susan on Oct-7th-02 at 11:58 AM
In response to Message #20.
Oh, we weren't talking about just any ol'
kind of running, sorry didn't make that clear, we were talking
about running from the cops! Long story, in a nutshell
I hope, the woman who threw the party has a boyfriend who
has a slingshot and she wanted to fire off the unused food
from barbecue, just for the fun of it. The boyfriend
kept insisting that we were going to jail, and the hostess
said, not if we can run we won't. Running through the
woods and such in heels, I don't think so, especially not
in a panic situation with the police nipping at our heels!
22. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Oct-7th-02 at 12:42 PM
In response to Message #21.
Susan, have you ever ran from the police?
23. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kashesan on Oct-7th-02 at 1:28 PM
In response to Message #9.
Victorias Secret-some of that stuff should
come with a tube of Mono Stat
24. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Oct-7th-02 at 1:43 PM
In response to Message #23.
Huh???? Oh, I like their lingerie, but I'm
not into wearing
bottoms anyway, I love their pretty robes. All I need is
a robe & a brassiere & some heels & I'm all set.
25. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by Susan on Oct-7th-02 at 11:49 PM
In response to Message #24.
I've run from the police in my teenage years,
bad girl that I was! Kimberly, no bottoms for you?
Oh my, I bet you're quite the popular girl at parties.
Kashesan, I don't usually do all that super dressy underwear
from Victoria's Secret, just the Wonder bra, mostly plain
ol' cotton for this girl! You wise up after a few years
of wearing that non-breathable stuff!
26. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Oct-8th-02 at 12:05 AM
In response to Message #25.
Yes I am.
I have never ran from the police, but I have hid out.
27. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by Susan on Oct-8th-02 at 1:38 AM
In response to Message #26.
Oooooo, girl! You're one of those bad
Leos too!!!
28. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Oct-8th-02 at 3:14 AM
In response to Message #27.
Oh no! I'm not bad, I'm just drawn that way!
Remember?
29. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by Susan on Oct-8th-02 at 11:45 AM
In response to Message #28.
Okay, yes, I guess you're one of those badly
drawn Leos too! Still don't know what I would do if
I was built like Jessica Rabbit though, probably fall over?
30. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Oct-8th-02 at 1:50 PM
In response to Message #29.
You don't fall over if you are balanced with
an
equally big behind. Not that I would know or anything.
31. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by Susan on Oct-9th-02 at 2:56 AM
In response to Message #30.
Well, I don't have the beginnings of
a bustle behind me and I can only dream of having the pneumatic
proportions of Jessica.
32. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Oct-9th-02 at 9:51 AM
In response to Message #31.
It is impossible to diet away a bosom, I don't
know
why, but that fat will not budge, I wonder if it is made
out of a different kind?
(Message last edited Oct-9th-02 10:11 AM.)
33. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by Susan on Oct-9th-02 at 11:31 AM
In response to Message #32.
Oh, I know, outside of a breast reduction
job, theres not much you can do for an overly large bosom.
But, I've never had that problem, my mom and sister on the
other hand....Yikes!
34. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Oct-9th-02 at 5:20 PM
In response to Message #33.
Isn't it strange the way we get off topic?
We were talking
about Victorian dresses & now it is bosoms. But Victorian
women had them also, I wonder if they worried about their
size or was it just the tiny waist they wanted? You know they
didn't mind how big their bottom half was because it was
hidden under all the skirts.
35. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by Susan on Oct-9th-02 at 9:04 PM
In response to Message #34.
Victorian women had bust enhancers and all
sorts of padding for women who were less endowed. Women's
breasts have just been one of those things that rise and fall,
like hemlines, sometimes big is in, sometimes not. Did
you ever hear that story of the champagne glass? That
Napolean had it molded so that one of Josephine's breasts
fit exactly in the bowl. I can't recall why he did it,
but, it was supposed to be the epitomy of perfect breast size.
I wonder how he would have felt if his glass runneth over?
36. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Oct-9th-02 at 9:56 PM
In response to Message #35.
Napolean was not from Tennessee! In case you
haven't
heard, I get alot of creeps also.
(Message last edited Oct-11th-02 11:19 PM.)
37. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by Susan on Oct-10th-02 at 1:36 AM
In response to Message #36.
Well, unfortunately, I'm one of those gals
that need a bust enhancer. But, I hear you, some of
my girlfriends over the years wondered if their faces were
somehow centered on their chests!
Ooooo, then I had this disquieting thought....did Josephine
create the champagne flute.....?
(Message last edited Oct-10th-02 1:37 AM.)
38. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Oct-10th-02 at 8:56 AM
In response to Message #37.
I've been looking up A&E's production
of Tess of the
D'Urbervilles, oh, what a beautiful movie that was! The
clothes were just breathtaking. The 'Justine Waddell as Tess'
look is what I'm trying to achieve (the line of the dresses
&
her dark hair & the no-makeup-makeup). I also loved Heather
Graham in From Hell. But, alas, I never get my current favorite
'looks' quite right.
Oh yeah, I just remembered, have you heard that about Napolean's
'flute' being preserved somewhere?
(Message last edited Oct-10th-02 10:32 AM.)
39. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Oct-10th-02 at 7:41 PM
In response to Message #38.
In 1977, 'Little Napolean' was sold in Paris
to an American
urologist for over $3000.
(Message last edited Oct-11th-02 11:17 PM.)
40. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by Susan on Oct-10th-02 at 9:06 PM
In response to Message #39.
Oh, I used to work with this woman from Christie's
and she had told us about it being for sale and she saw it.
I believe it was just the foreskin, she said it was incredibly
gross!!! I wonder if originally it was a keepsake for
someone? The only person now that I can think of whos
into keeping weird things was Angelina Jolie.
41. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Oct-10th-02 at 9:46 PM
In response to Message #40.
I wonder why he gave it away?
I think we two are the worst at rambling off the
subject, is that just the way Leo's are?
42. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by Susan on Oct-10th-02 at 9:56 PM
In response to Message #41.
I think so, when I chat with my friends its
from soup to nuts and back again!
43. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Oct-10th-02 at 10:23 PM
In response to Message #42.
(Message last edited Oct-11th-02 11:14 PM.)
44. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by harry on Oct-10th-02 at 11:16 PM
In response to Message #43.
To get you somewhat back on track of the title
of this thread here's an 1892 Bengaline dress.
The price is for the pattern, not the dress.
Lizzie's measurements?
45. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Oct-10th-02 at 11:27 PM
In response to Message #44.
That one is beautiful! That is alot like Lizzie's
dress
in the Newport picture, it would be nice if some of her
old patterns & dressmaker's notes would appear. I never
thought about that, some of her dressmaker's might have
saved things related to her & handed them down thru their
families. I wonder if anyone ever claimed Emma's fur coat
from storage? That is another new thought.
46. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by Susan on Oct-11th-02 at 2:51 AM
In response to Message #44.
Thanks, Harry! With a corset I could
do the waist measurement, I'm about a 27 to 28 incher myself,
but, that bust, um, no can do. Very pretty dress though,
I could just see Lizzie wearing something like that to go
visiting her friends.
47. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by kimberly on Oct-11th-02 at 11:52 AM
In response to Message #46.
It is strange that they can reproduce dresses
like that with
modern sizes, you would think it would throw off the lines
if
you had it cut to fit rather than wearing a corset to change
your shape to fit the dress. Susan, you could get the bust
measurement also, have you forgot about sewing ruffles in
the
linings of your basques?
48. "Re: The
Parts of a Late 19th Century Lady's Dress"
Posted by Susan on Oct-11th-02 at 8:10 PM
In response to Message #47.
Yes, I believe it would throw off the lines
of the dress as a corset makes a very smooth base besides
cinching in your waist. I recall reading something that
some women with more ample figures had a horrible time with
corsets as all the extra flesh had to go somewhere and it
usually went up and over the top of the corset so that there
was a roll of flesh there.
That would be too many ruffles to sew!
Navagation
Page updated
12 October, 2003
|