I was making myself a grilled panini the other day. To cut them into pieces, what I tend to do, is put a cloth covering the knife, and I then go for a cut. It avoids spill outs and keeps my crime scene intact.
In case of Andrew as well as Abby, I wonder if the murderer did this
1. Gave a few whacks first to have them unconscious with minimal splatter
2. Covered the targeted area with a cloth
3. Whacked the hell out of it, with no splatters
4. Took the cloth and placed them into the Menstrual bowl.
This way, there is not a single drop of blood on the murderer, which saves the cleaning time or the murderer to escape or call for help. Making it a 5 minute job than a 30 minute ordeal.
The only trouble I have with this approach. With this approach, there should be traces of cloth being found in the wounds. Which was not the case.
However, I await your responses.
No Blood: Another reason
Moderator: Adminlizzieborden
-
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2014 3:14 pm
- Real Name: Arien guy
- NancyDrew
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 8:33 am
- Gender: Female
- Real Name: Robin
- Location: New England
Re: No Blood: Another reason
It's thought, but you're right...traces of cloth fiber would have been discovered in the wounds, and to my knowledge, they were not.