Reasons to believe Lizzie innocent of acting solo
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 11:55 am
All -- the thread subject should read....."If Lizzie was involved in the murders, reasons to believe she did not act alone."
1) No proven murder weapon found on the property.
2) No blood found on Lizzie's person or clothing.
Can you think of any other SOLID reasons to believe Lizzie did not act alone in the murders of Andrew and Abby?
We've discussed the relatively plausible concept that the murderer could have used Andrew's Prince Albert coat to cover themselves when dispatching Andrew. There was plenty of time after Abby's death to have cleaned up and removed any signs of such.
That leaves us with the murder weapon. Seems like we have three potential solutions.
1) The handle-less hatchet was the murder weapon.
2) The Crowe barn roof hatchet was the murder weapon.
3) Lizzie had a co-conspirator, who removed the murder weapon from the property.
1) No proven murder weapon found on the property.
2) No blood found on Lizzie's person or clothing.
Can you think of any other SOLID reasons to believe Lizzie did not act alone in the murders of Andrew and Abby?
We've discussed the relatively plausible concept that the murderer could have used Andrew's Prince Albert coat to cover themselves when dispatching Andrew. There was plenty of time after Abby's death to have cleaned up and removed any signs of such.
That leaves us with the murder weapon. Seems like we have three potential solutions.
1) The handle-less hatchet was the murder weapon.
2) The Crowe barn roof hatchet was the murder weapon.
3) Lizzie had a co-conspirator, who removed the murder weapon from the property.