victorian mourning customs and attire
Moderator: Adminlizzieborden
- Allen
- Posts: 3409
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:38 pm
- Gender: Female
- Real Name: Me
victorian mourning customs and attire
these links all deal with clothing, especially proper mourning attire:
http://www.victoriana.com/library/harpers/funeral.html
http://www.geocities.com/victorianlace11/mourning.html
http://www.msu.edu/user/beltranm/mourning/mourning.htm
http://www.chicagohs.org/AOTM/oct98/oct98fact2.html
http://www.tudorlinks.com/treasury/articles/#Victorian
http://www.victoriana.com/library/harpers/funeral.html
http://www.geocities.com/victorianlace11/mourning.html
http://www.msu.edu/user/beltranm/mourning/mourning.htm
http://www.chicagohs.org/AOTM/oct98/oct98fact2.html
http://www.tudorlinks.com/treasury/articles/#Victorian
"He who cannot put his thoughts on ice should not enter into the head of dispute." - Friedrich Nietzsche
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:33 am
- Real Name:
- Location: Florida
Widows in Black
Some people today, especially women, view Victorian mourning customs as sexist because ladies who lost their husbands were expected to dress in black from head to toe while men who lost their wives only wore black armbands. But there was a valid reason for the discrepancy. The Bible teaches us to care for “widows and orphans.” It was on this Biblical instruction that women’s mourning customs were based, and it was for the widow’s protection. For example, if a woman owed a debt or entered a store to purchase goods, her black clothing announced to the world she was a widow and shopkeepers and other merchants were expected to be lenient if bills were paid late or if the lady did not have quite enough money to pay for her groceries. This is not to say everyone granted special privileges to widows, but in Victorian society, they were expected to do so.
Of course, fancy mourning attire could be expensive and women who did not have the money to purchase such clothing often borrowed black dresses and hats from friends and relatives or dyed some of their own clothes black.
Of course, fancy mourning attire could be expensive and women who did not have the money to purchase such clothing often borrowed black dresses and hats from friends and relatives or dyed some of their own clothes black.
- justagrrrl
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:05 pm
- Real Name:
- Location: New Bedford, MA
- Kat
- Posts: 14785
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2003 11:59 pm
- Real Name:
- Location: Central Florida
- Kashesan
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 6:59 am
- Real Name:
- Location: Boston
I have a friend who sews Victorian clothing and she recently crafted a pair of bloomers for my girlfriend. They are lovely little be-ribboned things-with the backside open for ease of...relieving oneself. I was surprised, though it makes perfect sense. (but for releiving onself how? I will spare you the really off-color jokes we shared over this little feature in the bloomies)
Kash
Kash
"It seemed friendly enough, but it had sharp claws and a great many teeth. Alice thought it best to treat it with respect"
Lewis Carroll
Lewis Carroll
-
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 3:57 pm
- Real Name:
I have a pair of those Victorian bloomers, and they're really breezy to wear. When going out in public, I wear something underneath, just in case I get hit by a bus. (I've always wondered why I should be concerned about my attire if hit by a bus. Lying there broken and bleeding, why would I care about the state of my underwear?)
"To lose one parent...may be regarded as misfortune; to lose both looks like carelessness."
-Oscar Wilde ("The Importance
of Being Earnest," 1895)
-Oscar Wilde ("The Importance
of Being Earnest," 1895)
-
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 3:57 pm
- Real Name:
I recall something called "petti-pants" that were designed to replace both panties and a half-slip. They were about the same length as bloomers but not as baggy. Nor did they have an open crotch. I have a couple of pairs of those that I've used with Victorian dress prior to finding some more authentic bloomers/drawers.
When I was in high school (1940s), wearing multiple starched petticoats came back into style. I recall starching them and then ironing for hours before going out on a date. I would climb into my date's car, sit just so and spread my petticoats and full skirt out around me, so that they wouldn't get wrinkled. It was as if to say, "Don't you dare put a dent in my attire!" Skirts in those days were about mid-calf length or slightly longer -- not floor-length as in Lizzie's day. What a dumb fashion that was! I think it came about because of the WWII fabric shortages. When we were finally able to get decent materials, we all went hog-wild with them. That was the era of the Dior "new look," which was actually a pretty old look.
When I was in high school (1940s), wearing multiple starched petticoats came back into style. I recall starching them and then ironing for hours before going out on a date. I would climb into my date's car, sit just so and spread my petticoats and full skirt out around me, so that they wouldn't get wrinkled. It was as if to say, "Don't you dare put a dent in my attire!" Skirts in those days were about mid-calf length or slightly longer -- not floor-length as in Lizzie's day. What a dumb fashion that was! I think it came about because of the WWII fabric shortages. When we were finally able to get decent materials, we all went hog-wild with them. That was the era of the Dior "new look," which was actually a pretty old look.
"To lose one parent...may be regarded as misfortune; to lose both looks like carelessness."
-Oscar Wilde ("The Importance
of Being Earnest," 1895)
-Oscar Wilde ("The Importance
of Being Earnest," 1895)
- Kat
- Posts: 14785
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2003 11:59 pm
- Real Name:
- Location: Central Florida
I wrote "boomers" meaning Bloomers- but you got my point, thanks! Yes you've described those petti-pants exactly!
My mother sewed "tent" dresses for me and my girlfriend with bloomers underneath and a triangular head scarf, so that we matched.
That was right after parochial school days where we always wore shorts under our uniforms so we could confidently play on the schoolyard equiptment at recess.
We went from those shorts to petti-pants in public school, California, c. 1962.
My mother sewed "tent" dresses for me and my girlfriend with bloomers underneath and a triangular head scarf, so that we matched.
That was right after parochial school days where we always wore shorts under our uniforms so we could confidently play on the schoolyard equiptment at recess.
We went from those shorts to petti-pants in public school, California, c. 1962.
-
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 3:57 pm
- Real Name:
Ah, nostalgia. I remember a fashion that combined shorts and a skirt (or a jumper) for girls. This was in the 1960s also, and I thought, "What a wonderfully practical outfit. It looks dressy enough for school and yet has the shorts for modesty." I then spent my daughter's entire clothing budget on several of those outfits. A couple of days after she started school, she brought home a pronouncement that "skorts" were not allowed at school! Now they tell me! I think she had already worn the ones I had bought, so no returning them to the store. As I recall, I solved the problem by cutting the shorts off and simply having her wear the outfits as regular skirts, which were extremely short. Of course that wasn't nearly as modest. What idiocy! There I was, an impoverished single mother, trying to cope with wardrobes for three kids, and the school drops a bomb on me. When I think of what kids get away with these days...
"To lose one parent...may be regarded as misfortune; to lose both looks like carelessness."
-Oscar Wilde ("The Importance
of Being Earnest," 1895)
-Oscar Wilde ("The Importance
of Being Earnest," 1895)