
Thanks for the response Lyddie.

Yes, I find it unethical to publish the book as it was issued.
What happened was that the book sold well, and the temptation to publish more was great and the publisher then fell on his face and did so.
All they needed do was change the cloth color, to perhaps a conservative brown. This would make the bold statement that it was not the original 1000 copy editions.
The other way they could have done it was to publish the book, say, signed and numbered, with another exact issue with out the limited edition declaration and signature, but, "but," it should have been done all at once, at first issue, and advertised to the public as so and sold at a cheaper rate. This way more copies could have been published in the future and the limited signed edition would grow in value.
It's to bad that they stooped to this publishing practice, more so since the King Phillip Publishers have done a wonderful job with their publications and a great service to Lizzie studies. Even the books are well constructed in a printing world where glue and cheap paper is the norm.
Still a must have for Lizzie collectors and in my opinion takes nothing away from the value of the book.
