Just finished viewing a TV show on the Lindbergh kidnapping crime.
The infamous rail from the ladder and Hauptmann's handwriting were put under modern forensic examination. 3 experts for each. I won't tell you the results.
The show will be repeated this evening at 11 p.m., Eastern time on Court TV.
The show is a repeat and was originally shown in May 2005.
Very interesting show and worth a watch if you have an interest in the case.
Lindbergh Kidnapping show
Moderator: Adminlizzieborden
- Harry
- Posts: 4058
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2003 4:28 pm
- Real Name: harry
- Location: South Carolina
Lindbergh Kidnapping show
I know I ask perfection of a quite imperfect world
And fool enough to think that's what I'll find
And fool enough to think that's what I'll find
-
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 12:55 pm
- Real Name:
- Location: Bordentown NJ
Re: Lindbergh Kidnapping show
Since 1975 there were books published, mostly controverting the decision.Harry @ Mon Apr 03, 2006 7:08 pm wrote:Just finished viewing a TV show on the Lindbergh kidnapping crime.
The infamous rail from the ladder and Hauptmann's handwriting were put under modern forensic examination. 3 experts for each. I won't tell you the results.
The show will be repeated this evening at 11 p.m., Eastern time on Court TV.
The show is a repeat and was originally shown in May 2005.
Very interesting show and worth a watch if you have an interest in the case.
One said the rail # 16 was a forgery, taken from the attic to incriminate Hauptmann. Because of the difference in height (as I remember it). Having like nail holes is meaningless, any good carpenter can make a hole in a board so it fits (IMO).
No fingerprints of Hauptmann was found on any note; but this is not signs of innocence given the many hands that touched it. We now know that Hauptmann was made to write many such ransom notes, as if they wanted another forged evidence. Was there any time stamp or notations to identify the original note?
The lack of blood in the child's bedroom says he didn't die there.
The one fact that is slurred over is: whoever had the child's pajamas was guilty. HOW did they trace it back Hauptmann (never did?).