Dr. Dedrick or Dr. Dolan, who to believe.
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 8:00 pm
Dr. Dolan testified at the Preliminary, p112, about his arrival at the Borden house:
"Q. Where were you when you got any information from anybody as to the occurrances at this house?
A. In front of Andrew Borden’s house.
Q. Was that the first you heard of it, there?
A. Yes Sir.
Q. Did you get any information causing you to go there?
A. No Sir."
Then at the Trial, p909:
"Q. (By Mr. Adams.) I do not understand, Doctor, that you received any message to take you to this house on the day of the tragedy?
A. No, sir.
Q. But you were driving to your patients and going by this house?
A. That is it; yes, sir.
Q. And saw something which led you to get out and go in?
A. Yes, sir."
Dr. Dedrick in the Witness Statements, p22, says different:
“I was going on a call to Whipple street, when I saw Dr. Dolan drive along Second street like mad, and stop at Mr. Borden’s."
If Dedrick is correct why would Dolan be driving "like mad" along Second Street if he (Dolan) had no knowledge yet of the crimes.?
Not terribly important but yet another one of those weird contradictions which are throughout the case.
"Q. Where were you when you got any information from anybody as to the occurrances at this house?
A. In front of Andrew Borden’s house.
Q. Was that the first you heard of it, there?
A. Yes Sir.
Q. Did you get any information causing you to go there?
A. No Sir."
Then at the Trial, p909:
"Q. (By Mr. Adams.) I do not understand, Doctor, that you received any message to take you to this house on the day of the tragedy?
A. No, sir.
Q. But you were driving to your patients and going by this house?
A. That is it; yes, sir.
Q. And saw something which led you to get out and go in?
A. Yes, sir."
Dr. Dedrick in the Witness Statements, p22, says different:
“I was going on a call to Whipple street, when I saw Dr. Dolan drive along Second street like mad, and stop at Mr. Borden’s."
If Dedrick is correct why would Dolan be driving "like mad" along Second Street if he (Dolan) had no knowledge yet of the crimes.?
Not terribly important but yet another one of those weird contradictions which are throughout the case.