Overview
Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 7:56 pm
Hello! I had a thought that if we look at the basics, something might ring true or not.
1. Uncle John was not there by chance that night and day. He was there for a reason and somehow the reason has a connection to the murders.
2. Whoever killed Abby committed extreme violence very close up and was in a fury. The killer was not concerned with blood splatter or leaving evidence on their person. They were somehow personally involved.
3. Lizzie acts like a person engaged in a cover-up, not like a person who just committed a double rage killing. From the time Lizzie chatted up Mrs. Churchill the night before Lizzie seems to be trying to set a scene. The story of the note, the attempts to get Bridget out of the way, the placing of herself outside the house during the deed all indicate a conspiratorial role. This is backed up by the ridiculous Dewey charge to the jury mentioned in that other excellent thread.
4. Emma and Lizzie had time to discuss the situation during the time they were both away from the house the week or so before the killings.
5. Lizzie seems to have been a completely normal person in the years after the killings even requesting burial at her fathers feet when she died.
6. Like O.J., the Borden sister never made any further attempts to "find the real killer". This indicates they knew the whole story.
I don't think Lizzie wielded the weapon (if it was really an axe, who knows) but she helped set up the escape and facilitated the deed at least where Abby is concerned. I think Andrew may have been collateral damage. Of course my opinion is ever changing.
BTW I LOVE this board and thank you all for providing such an ejoyable place to spend time !
1. Uncle John was not there by chance that night and day. He was there for a reason and somehow the reason has a connection to the murders.
2. Whoever killed Abby committed extreme violence very close up and was in a fury. The killer was not concerned with blood splatter or leaving evidence on their person. They were somehow personally involved.
3. Lizzie acts like a person engaged in a cover-up, not like a person who just committed a double rage killing. From the time Lizzie chatted up Mrs. Churchill the night before Lizzie seems to be trying to set a scene. The story of the note, the attempts to get Bridget out of the way, the placing of herself outside the house during the deed all indicate a conspiratorial role. This is backed up by the ridiculous Dewey charge to the jury mentioned in that other excellent thread.
4. Emma and Lizzie had time to discuss the situation during the time they were both away from the house the week or so before the killings.
5. Lizzie seems to have been a completely normal person in the years after the killings even requesting burial at her fathers feet when she died.
6. Like O.J., the Borden sister never made any further attempts to "find the real killer". This indicates they knew the whole story.
I don't think Lizzie wielded the weapon (if it was really an axe, who knows) but she helped set up the escape and facilitated the deed at least where Abby is concerned. I think Andrew may have been collateral damage. Of course my opinion is ever changing.
BTW I LOVE this board and thank you all for providing such an ejoyable place to spend time !