Page 1 of 1

No Blood: Another reason

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:26 am
by Curiousmind2014
I was making myself a grilled panini the other day. To cut them into pieces, what I tend to do, is put a cloth covering the knife, and I then go for a cut. It avoids spill outs and keeps my crime scene intact.

In case of Andrew as well as Abby, I wonder if the murderer did this

1. Gave a few whacks first to have them unconscious with minimal splatter
2. Covered the targeted area with a cloth
3. Whacked the hell out of it, with no splatters
4. Took the cloth and placed them into the Menstrual bowl.

This way, there is not a single drop of blood on the murderer, which saves the cleaning time or the murderer to escape or call for help. Making it a 5 minute job than a 30 minute ordeal.

The only trouble I have with this approach. With this approach, there should be traces of cloth being found in the wounds. Which was not the case.

However, I await your responses.

Re: No Blood: Another reason

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 7:14 am
by NancyDrew
It's thought, but you're right...traces of cloth fiber would have been discovered in the wounds, and to my knowledge, they were not.