A Plethora of Police Promotions
Posted: Tue May 26, 2026 3:39 pm
I did a little digging after hearing the testimony of the promotions during the trial in the audiobook I'm listening to. I tried a forum search and didn't see a thread on this, but it does strike me as being something to ponder.
CONFIRMED POLICE PROMOTIONS BETWEEN THE BORDEN MURDERS AND THE JUNE 1893 TRIAL
The clearest promotion testimony comes from Francis L. Edson’s cross-examination. He identifies himself as promoted, then names Harrington, Doherty, Medley, Connors, and Desmond as others “around the house” who had been promoted. He expressly says Mullaly had not been promoted.
Francis L. Edson
Rank/status at time of murders, Aug. 4, 1892: Acting sergeant / sergeant of police
Rank/status at trial, June 1893: Lieutenant of police
Promotion date stated: February 1893
Notes: Edson states he was lieutenant at trial and acting sergeant the previous August. On cross-examination he confirms this was a promotion in February.
Philip Harrington
Rank/status at time of murders, Aug. 4, 1892: Patrolman
Rank/status at trial, June 1893: Captain
Promotion date stated: February 10, 1893
Notes: Harrington states directly that he was a patrolman in August 1892, captain at trial, and promoted “the tenth day of February last.”
Patrick H. Doherty
Rank/status at time of murders, Aug. 4, 1892: Special officer, detailed for special work; “what sometimes is called inspector”
Rank/status at trial, June 1893: Captain
Promotion date stated: Not found in the testimony reviewed
Notes: Doherty gives his own before-and-after status: special officer in August 1892 and captain at trial. Edson separately confirms Doherty had been promoted.
William H. Medley
Rank/status at time of murders, Aug. 4, 1892: Patrolman
Rank/status at trial, June 1893: Inspector, with rank of lieutenant
Promotion date stated: December 1892
Notes: Medley says he was a patrolman the previous year and had been promoted in December. Edson describes his trial status as “Inspector with rank of lieutenant.”
Patrick / P. Connors
Rank/status at time of murders, Aug. 4, 1892: Acting sergeant
Rank/status at trial, June 1893: Captain
Promotion date stated: Not found in the testimony reviewed
Notes: Edson names Connors as promoted. He says Connors was acting sergeant at the time and captain at trial. The transcript question appears to ask “Now lieutenant?” but Edson’s answer is “Captain.”
Dennis Desmond, Jr.
Rank/status at time of murders, Aug. 4, 1892: Acting captain
Rank/status at trial, June 1893: Captain
Promotion date stated: Not found in the testimony reviewed
Notes: Desmond’s own testimony gives the before-and-after status: acting captain in August 1892 and captain at trial. Medley also describes him as “acting captain by appointment of the mayor” during the later search.
EXPLICIT NON-PROMOTION
Michael Mullaly
Rank/status at time of murders, Aug. 4, 1892: Patrolman
Rank/status at trial, June 1893: Patrolman
Promotion result: Not promoted
Notes: Edson was asked whether Mullaly had been promoted and answered no. Mullaly’s own testimony says he was a Fall River police officer, had been on the force over fifteen years, and his position was patrolman, the same as the previous August.
COUNT AND PERCENTAGE
A broader roster from the trial and witness statements includes at least Allen, Fleet, Hilliard, Harrington, Doherty, Mullaly, Medley, Edson, Mahoney, Desmond, Connors/Conners, Quigley, Riley, Devine, Seaver, and others who appear in particular searches or follow-up work.
If that broader working roster is treated as roughly 16 police or police-adjacent investigators, then the six confirmed promotions represent approximately 37.5%.
Caution on the broader percentage:
The 85.7% figure is the strongest testimony-based percentage because it uses the exact group discussed under oath in the promotion questioning. The 37.5% figure is an estimate based on a broader reconstructed roster, because the record does not provide one clean master list of every officer “on scene.”
SUMMARY ASSESSMENT
Six promotions in under a year among officers visibly involved in the Borden investigation is conspicuous. It is not proof of impropriety by itself: several officers were already in acting, special, or investigative roles, and Desmond’s movement from acting captain to captain looks more like regularization than a full step up. Still, the pattern is not casual. Harrington rose from patrolman to captain, Medley from patrolman to inspector with lieutenant rank, Doherty from special officer or inspector-type work to captain, Connors from acting sergeant to captain, and Edson from acting sergeant to lieutenant. Within the subset actually discussed under oath, 85.7% were promoted; even under a broader on-scene roster estimate, about 37.5% were promoted. For less than a single year, that looks unusually dense unless Fall River had a major force-wide reorganization, expansion, or political turnover. The trial record alone does not establish such a general reorganization, so the safest conclusion is that the promotions were numerous enough to be rhetorically useful to the defense and historically notable, but the record does not prove they were rewards for the Borden case.
CONFIRMED POLICE PROMOTIONS BETWEEN THE BORDEN MURDERS AND THE JUNE 1893 TRIAL
The clearest promotion testimony comes from Francis L. Edson’s cross-examination. He identifies himself as promoted, then names Harrington, Doherty, Medley, Connors, and Desmond as others “around the house” who had been promoted. He expressly says Mullaly had not been promoted.
Francis L. Edson
Rank/status at time of murders, Aug. 4, 1892: Acting sergeant / sergeant of police
Rank/status at trial, June 1893: Lieutenant of police
Promotion date stated: February 1893
Notes: Edson states he was lieutenant at trial and acting sergeant the previous August. On cross-examination he confirms this was a promotion in February.
Philip Harrington
Rank/status at time of murders, Aug. 4, 1892: Patrolman
Rank/status at trial, June 1893: Captain
Promotion date stated: February 10, 1893
Notes: Harrington states directly that he was a patrolman in August 1892, captain at trial, and promoted “the tenth day of February last.”
Patrick H. Doherty
Rank/status at time of murders, Aug. 4, 1892: Special officer, detailed for special work; “what sometimes is called inspector”
Rank/status at trial, June 1893: Captain
Promotion date stated: Not found in the testimony reviewed
Notes: Doherty gives his own before-and-after status: special officer in August 1892 and captain at trial. Edson separately confirms Doherty had been promoted.
William H. Medley
Rank/status at time of murders, Aug. 4, 1892: Patrolman
Rank/status at trial, June 1893: Inspector, with rank of lieutenant
Promotion date stated: December 1892
Notes: Medley says he was a patrolman the previous year and had been promoted in December. Edson describes his trial status as “Inspector with rank of lieutenant.”
Patrick / P. Connors
Rank/status at time of murders, Aug. 4, 1892: Acting sergeant
Rank/status at trial, June 1893: Captain
Promotion date stated: Not found in the testimony reviewed
Notes: Edson names Connors as promoted. He says Connors was acting sergeant at the time and captain at trial. The transcript question appears to ask “Now lieutenant?” but Edson’s answer is “Captain.”
Dennis Desmond, Jr.
Rank/status at time of murders, Aug. 4, 1892: Acting captain
Rank/status at trial, June 1893: Captain
Promotion date stated: Not found in the testimony reviewed
Notes: Desmond’s own testimony gives the before-and-after status: acting captain in August 1892 and captain at trial. Medley also describes him as “acting captain by appointment of the mayor” during the later search.
EXPLICIT NON-PROMOTION
Michael Mullaly
Rank/status at time of murders, Aug. 4, 1892: Patrolman
Rank/status at trial, June 1893: Patrolman
Promotion result: Not promoted
Notes: Edson was asked whether Mullaly had been promoted and answered no. Mullaly’s own testimony says he was a Fall River police officer, had been on the force over fifteen years, and his position was patrolman, the same as the previous August.
COUNT AND PERCENTAGE
A broader roster from the trial and witness statements includes at least Allen, Fleet, Hilliard, Harrington, Doherty, Mullaly, Medley, Edson, Mahoney, Desmond, Connors/Conners, Quigley, Riley, Devine, Seaver, and others who appear in particular searches or follow-up work.
If that broader working roster is treated as roughly 16 police or police-adjacent investigators, then the six confirmed promotions represent approximately 37.5%.
Caution on the broader percentage:
The 85.7% figure is the strongest testimony-based percentage because it uses the exact group discussed under oath in the promotion questioning. The 37.5% figure is an estimate based on a broader reconstructed roster, because the record does not provide one clean master list of every officer “on scene.”
SUMMARY ASSESSMENT
Six promotions in under a year among officers visibly involved in the Borden investigation is conspicuous. It is not proof of impropriety by itself: several officers were already in acting, special, or investigative roles, and Desmond’s movement from acting captain to captain looks more like regularization than a full step up. Still, the pattern is not casual. Harrington rose from patrolman to captain, Medley from patrolman to inspector with lieutenant rank, Doherty from special officer or inspector-type work to captain, Connors from acting sergeant to captain, and Edson from acting sergeant to lieutenant. Within the subset actually discussed under oath, 85.7% were promoted; even under a broader on-scene roster estimate, about 37.5% were promoted. For less than a single year, that looks unusually dense unless Fall River had a major force-wide reorganization, expansion, or political turnover. The trial record alone does not establish such a general reorganization, so the safest conclusion is that the promotions were numerous enough to be rhetorically useful to the defense and historically notable, but the record does not prove they were rewards for the Borden case.