Hiram & Lurana - Census oddity
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2026 9:53 pm
Sharing what seems to be an oddity of how the Borden family reported their information for the 1855 Massachusetts State Census. Hiram Harrington married Lurana Borden January 26, 1854, but on the 1855 Census (data gathered August 1855), Lurana is listed as a Borden and Hiram Harrington is listed as living with the Borden's at 12 Ferry, but his name is nowhere close to Lurana's. In all cases I'm familiar with, married couples are listed sequentially.
Knowing that Hiram and Andrew ended up disliking each other to a pretty strong degree, I'm always curious with data points that could possibly give us clues. I suppose the person who gave the census taker the names of the home occupants, could have listed the family members and the census taker gave everyone the same last name regardless of marriage status (which isn't noted on the census report), but then got Hiram and Selecta Morse correct.
I find this kind of stuff fascinating and fun.
Entry from 1854 Fall River Marriage Register. click to enlarge Click to enlarge
Knowing that Hiram and Andrew ended up disliking each other to a pretty strong degree, I'm always curious with data points that could possibly give us clues. I suppose the person who gave the census taker the names of the home occupants, could have listed the family members and the census taker gave everyone the same last name regardless of marriage status (which isn't noted on the census report), but then got Hiram and Selecta Morse correct.
I find this kind of stuff fascinating and fun.
Entry from 1854 Fall River Marriage Register. click to enlarge Click to enlarge