Regarding John: in his book, “The Trial of Lizzie Borden,” dear old Pearson relates a charming anecdote relative to a personal conversation between himself and John Cummings, whom Pearson claims was called into the case by the prosecution to consult on the “poison” issue. John Cummings died in 1929 – 8 years before the publication of Pearson’s book. What a memory Pearson must have had! Does this sound like an “urban legend” to anyone else?
I could find only one mention of a “Cummings” in “The Knowlton Papers,” in a letter from Pillsbury to Knowlton, dated September 20, 1892: “… I have to begin very soon to lay out the season campaign with the Chief Justice, and want to know as nearly as possible what is to be done. Perhaps when you next meet Cummings, if he has returned, you can get his view as to having the pleas disposed of at the time of the trial….”( Pg. 84). How’s that for tantalizing? Any thoughts? The Stickler

